Civilination

Taking a stand against online harassment, character assassination and violence

  • Home
  • About
    • In the News
    • What We Do
  • CiviliNation Academy
  • Resource Center
    • Resources to Protect Yourself Online
    • Attorney List
    • Anti-Harassment, Civility & Associated Research Organizations
    • Fact-Checking Sites
    • News & Media Literacy, and Misinformation & Disinformation Resources
    • Privacy Rights Organizations
    • Recommended Books
    • Investigative Journalism Organizations
    • Using SecureDrop To Communicate with News Organizations
    • Ethics
    • Barometer
  • News

Sometimes Identifying Your Online Attacker Is Enough

January 27, 2011 by CiviliNation

Online attacks on individuals and organizations can have far-reaching and serious effects. Not merely incidences of questionable behavior, at their worst attacks can cause stress disorders in their victims and result in reputational and economic harm that’s difficult to undo.

But for some targets, simply being able to identify and publicly reveal their attacker is enough.

That’s what happened in the case of model Liskula Cohen. In 2009 Cohen was labeled  “skanky” and a “ho” by an anonymous blogger using Google’s Blogger platform. She sued, determined to find out who made the disparaging remarks, and a judge ordered Google to hand over the blogger’s IP address, leading to the identification of the individual. (Cohen subsequently dropped her lawsuit, which led some members of the legal community to accuse her of having abused the legal process by filing suit simply to determine the identity of her attacker, while others supported her action as a practical realization that she had been vindicated in the public arena).

Sports writer Jeff Pearlman, meanwhile, decided to track down and confront his Twitter detractors on his own. He wrote about his experience in Tracking down my online haters, noting that “when journalists take the time to respond personally to venomous notes, proving that they are made of flesh and blood, the reaction is strikingly — and puzzlingly — positive.” (Read the response from one of the Twitter detractors, as well as further analysis of the entire situation, here.)

And perhaps therein lies a part of the solution to the problem: putting a human face on the targets and requiring accountability from their attackers.

Share on Facebook Share
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Pinterest Share
Share on LinkedIn Share
Share on Digg Share

Filed Under: Cybercivility Tagged With: Cybercivility

Recent news

  • Thank You and Goodbye June 17, 2021
  • FIR Interview March 17, 2021
  • Branded Harassment: When Brands Start the Conversation and Haters Take It Over March 11, 2021
  • The Backpack Show March 2, 2021

© 2021 CiviliNation